There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By kevlahan (registered) | Posted October 23, 2013 at 09:55:32
Part of the issue that many commenters have been involved in these issues for over a decade and have grown frustrated with Hamilton's "one step forward, two steps back" approach to cycling and pedestrian infrastructure as well as recognizing what streets need to look like to be successful economically and residentially.
At the same time we've seen other cities make massive strides in a very short time: think of cycling infrastructure in NYC, Montreal, Vancouver, or Paris. Does the fact these are large cities with complex transportation needs make it easier to implement massive change? The opposite should be true.
As Graham pointed out, timidity and refusal to commit have also led to skepticism, distrust and impatience. And its important to recognize that the tactical urbanism initiatives led quickly to important shifts and changes on the street. Just waiting patiently for studies to complete and "attitudes to shift" didn't produce results.
A good example is the 30km/h zone in the North End.
This took over a decade and a huge amount of community pressure to make a reality. It wouldn't have happened if residents just asked politely and waited.
At the Durand Neighbourhood Association meeting last night the community police officer told us that it has already been very successful in reducing speed and aggressive driving and that we "should look into it for the Durand".
However, what the police officer didn't know is that the city has insisted that we "monitor" this pilot project for FIVE YEARS, during which time there is a moratorium on any other 30km/h zones! Why can't we continuously monitor and decide to end the pilot early if the success is obvious? In any case, a full year should be more than enough to assess the impact.
This is a good example of how positive change can be used to block further improvements. Pilot projects are supposed to be short and flexible, and lower the threshold for change and experimentation. Not be used as an excuse to block improvements for half a decade!
Permalink | Context