Light Rail Transit would surely fuel the fires of rapid change in this city, but it would be a welcome change.
By Larry Pattison
Published July 22, 2011
My grandfather is 96 years young. No one has seen this city evolve like these long-standing members of our community. He was eight when his family immigrated to Canada from Denmark in 1923, but outside of a tour of duty in Europe during World War II, Hamilton is the only home he has otherwise known.
Both my parents were born, raised, and still reside in Hamilton. Although they are 30+ years younger than my grandfather, they have seen this city change quite drastically over their lifetime, including the fall of our once vibrant downtown core.
To be reminded of the way in which our downtown once pulsated with lights and people, electric cars and automobiles cruising down King Street, one need only flip through the pages of a book published for the 125th anniversary of Hamilton, entitled Pardon My Lunch Bucket.
Although our urban centre is changing for the better (and I see that change first hand almost daily as someone who is in the core in the morning and in the evening as I commute in and out of Hamilton), but there is still much to do to bring that area of our city back to a place our fathers once enjoyed hanging out in when they were younger. Hamilton has a long way to go to alter the image so many carry, of a core they haven't stepped foot amongst in a very long time, but it's on the right path.
When we were younger, we stated how we would never say the things our parents did like 'when I was your age'. Well I am 38 years old now and 'when I was a kid', I remember playing kissing tag in the high-grassed fields that once quietly grew where Limeridge Mall now stands. All of that land west of Upper Sherman where I grew up, and north of Berko, was mostly undeveloped at that time.
My grandfather talks of picking cherries on the farm that once occupied the land underneath the high-rise he has lived in since it was built over 30 years ago. My parents and grandparents talk of shops and hotels (we call them bars now), they used to frequent as we travel through town.
I now have many of my own 'when I was your age' stories to tell my children, some as recent as the demise of the long-neglected Centre Mall, one of the first shopping malls in all of North America.
Things are changing quite rapidly in Hamilton in general - faster than we can fight to preserve what we love and don't want to lose within our city. In many ways, the future of Hamilton is being planned for us by big business and out-of-town investors who see dollar signs instead of a city wrapped with trees, draped with waterfalls, surrounded by multiple bodies of water and blanketed by vast farmland, forests, and green space.
If there is a dollar to be made, none of these features listed above, which so many of us find to be endearing qualities of our city, will halt development if nobody attempts to stand in their way.
If we can't sell them as a city, why they should invest within the city boundaries instead of expanding into areas of our municipal boundaries that we should be looking to protect and for which we should be looking to set urban boundaries.
Hamilton is a city without a true overall business plan or as one of my former instructors once asked of our class, Hamilton hasn't answered the question as to 'what it wants to be when it grows up'. Our city needs to better visualize its long-term goals because if we don't do this soon, our future will continue to be designed for us by those willing to see our city become little brother to Toronto with sprawl stretching to Caledonia, Smithville, Grimsby and Guelph, with very little green in between; all in the name of progress.
I have been sold on so many levels as to the benefits of Light Rail for some time, especially with regards to how it might figure into the planning of the proposed stadium district. But it wasn't until a recent article on Raise the Hammer that I truly realized how it could greatly impact two projects dear to my heart: the aforementioned stadium district, and that LRT might encourage the powers to be in this city to look at defining some hard-set boundaries for urban sprawl.
RTH editor Ryan McGreal wrote:
Portland had a much lower population density when it decided, in the 1970s, to impose a firm urban boundary and to use federal highway funding to build its first LRT line.
The high density that [Mayor Bob] Bratina says is the reason for Portland's LRT success is actually a product of that city's success at directing traffic into high quality urban intensification instead of endless sprawl."
LRT is something many of our children are going to want to see and if we act now, it will be a well developed system by the time my own girls are young teenagers wanting to explore the whole of Hamilton's surface. Will they travel within on Light Rail, or leave on paths drawn by GO or paved by endless highways leading them out of dodge?
I believe many parents dream of their children living within close proximity when they grow up, and of being able to play an active part in their grandchildren's lives. For this to happen, there is much to do to prepare their city as a place that they will want to raise a child themselves; economically, environmentally, and overall liveability.
I don't want Hamilton to be like every other largely populated metropolitan centre. I want it to be Hamilton; a city that can hold its own. A diverse city of many communities surrounded by and filled with, substantial plots of green space and farmland. Once that green is gone, we can't get it back.
LRT would surely fuel the fires of rapid change in this city, but it would be a welcome change. We are losing heritage buildings, schools, valuable land, and valleys, faster than we can vocalize our attachment to these features that make up what we love about our city, like being able to drive 20 minutes from our cities core and suddenly finding yourself driving quiet country roads with the smells of cows and the sounds of natures breathing in through your open car window.
It's what Light Rail could help us save and what it could help us revitalize amongst the downtown wards of our city that truly sell it as the next step Hamilton needs to take.
We can't be afraid of moving forward. Believe me when I say that I have spent way too much time in my life fearing the unknown images of change. I have allowed that fear within to paint its own portrait of how change might look instead of embracing the future and allowing it to formulate its own image of how change could open up doors that I couldn't have imagined would ever be possible.
I think we should take a step back as a city. Work together as a community; politicians, local businesses, school boards, post secondary education institutions, and citizens alike, to create a business model for all four corners of this city. I will challenge however, that many in Hamilton already see LRT as something that will stand front and centre in the final plan.
LRT is a solid platform on which to build our business plan, and something we should move forward with, while we step back to look at the broader picture of Hamilton's future.
Where GO Transit is concerned, I used to often wonder myself why a city as large as Hamilton never had any parking for commuters. Perhaps that is Hamilton's 'thing'? No parking at our major train and bus hubs, and little parking around major sports stadiums. Many have never seen these aspects of our city as something that we were lacking. Maybe in a roundabout way, these 'limitations' have unintentionally set us up for a future that is much less dependent on cars?
By adding more parking around Ivor Wynne or extensive paved lots at the planned James North or Centennial Parkway stations, are we actually taking an undesirable step back?
I am not sure about those last statements myself, but perhaps it's something to ponder as we look at the long-term vision of our city as we plan LRT, GO stations, and Stadium Districts.
If Hamilton continues or furthers its path of not adhering to the car culture, do we lose a lot of residents and detract visitors - or do we attract many more people looking for a city more focused on public transit, bike lanes, and walkability?
You have a vision for your city. I have a vision for my city but the problem is, money also has its own vision for our cities. What is the balance that will enable us all to thrive amongst this community?
What does Hamilton want to be when it grows up? How will it show leadership? Why will it be the Best Place to Raise a Child?