There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By H+H (registered) - website | Posted June 09, 2012 at 02:39:04
I have to say I'm a little perplexed at many of the comments here. Setting aside the really over-the-top and unrelated to anything comments, some seem to suggest that I, and RTH, have taken a cheap shot at the TiCats. Really?
The post directly quotes Mitchell and Young from row Spec article. It doesn't expand, explain, or eviscerate. Admittedly, It does end with a comment about the irony (dramatic for those who need it) of the situation. About how a partner you trusted changes their mind and says no at the last minute. The difference is that in the case of Mac, it won't cost the citizens of Hamilton any money (at least not so far but you never know what the Cats will do next), although there will be lost revenue on the part of some local businesses (bars, restaurants, parking lots). But remember, the Cats were not planning on playing all of their "home" games in Hamilton during the 2013 season in any case. Moncton has been mentioned many times.
In the case of the stadium, it will cost the citizens many tens of millions of dollars, not just in building costs, but also opportunity costs. The IWS site will never amount to much more than it has been for the past 75 years. It can't. It's surrounded by residential. This happened at the last minute when our "partner" changed their mind about where the stadium should be built. We were left scrambling and forced to take nothing or to take third best, or worse, as our location of choice. The Future Fund was nearly emptied to do this.
I'm a Hamilton booster. I put my money, time, and energies doing so. Having said that, I'm not about to overlook the fact that a trusted partner turned their back on us and forced us into a once in a lifetime (not to mention multiple generations) decision on the largest publicly funded building project this city has seen (excluding the RHVP) in decades. That's why dramatic irony seemed appropriate. As is the case with dramatic irony, the audience sees and understands the implications of what is being said but the characters in the play do not.
The stadium deal is done. We all know that. The money will be spent on the stadium, whether you support it or not. Surely, we can be permitted to point out the irony in the situation between Mac and the Cats without being labelled devils or Hamilton haters.
gcrawford
Permalink | Context