There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By ScreamingViking (registered) | Posted April 26, 2012 at 12:54:50 in reply to Comment 76242
I'm not going to wade into the debate about what Young and the Ticats did. I do have a personal view, but I also see the point of moving on and trying to create the most positive outcome we can, regardless of whether each of us felt the decision was wrong or right or of little consequence. And I apologize in advance if this comes off as a rant - it's not intended that way, just my perspective to add to the dialogue about something that holds personal importance for me.
I'd like to comment on the issue of "city building" and "benefits."
I think too much has been made of those things with respect to this particular piece of infrastructure. And to me, that's really what the new stadium is: infrastructure... cultural infrastructure. Its core purpose is to supply a demand, in this case to provide a venue for spectator field sports. That demand will vary from larger events such as CFL or Pan-Am soccer games (and possibly professional soccer, if the idea of a Hamilton team comes to fruition), medium-sized events such as the Vanier Cup or amateur championships, and smaller events such as high-school football and soccer, youth sports, or other community uses that may not fill the majority of seats.
Expecting that piece of infrastructure to be the catalyst for more is asking a lot. Particularly when the large events that draw the biggest demand are sparsely scheduled throughout the year, meaning opportunities are quite limited for spin-off businesses that would rely on masses of stadium users.
Consider that if the current stadium has not in that way fully benefited the neighbourhood that surrounds it, why would the new one do so in a different, albeit sexier location?
Or is there an expectation that the government investment alone would generate "me too" investments from the private sector? But what would the private sector stand to benefit from doing so? Would a new office building or condo complex be more feasible locating next to a large structure like this? Would a new restaurant or retail outlet generate more business next to a building that is not used to capacity more than a handful of times a year? The case for those investments is based more on other site-related merits, none of which depend on co-location of a stadium.
It becomes a dangerous game when debate is driven by conjecture about potential secondary benefits; impacts we cannot predict with much certainty. I see this play out with regard to other developments too - our road and transit investments are one example, and the location of public facilities and services is another. Some of those things are more likely to spur secondary benefits and development, but the main reason we should be building them is to serve the core demand (both current and projected) and improve the overall level or quality of service, so long as there's a positive economic or social benefit to doing so.
Short of drawing massive crowds several days a week, there are not many businesses that will have a better economic case for locating near the new stadium, no matter where it is built. So the new stadium's role as a catalyst may be more restricted to attracting a greater number of sporting events (most of them smaller scaled) and community-related uses because the facilities may be appropriately suitable to their needs as well as those of the primary tenants; the current stadium is clearly lacking in that respect, mainly due to age and outdated design.
I think we can all have hopes for more, but the social/cultural benefit of the stadium itself should be the key focus here, and not the potential for "city building."
Permalink | Context