Comment 75655

By rule of law (anonymous) | Posted April 03, 2012 at 09:39:21

I'm going to suggest that your complaint was vexatious. It was proven that Ferguson had no interest in the matter and the bidding process was determined to be fair and separated from whatever influence Ferguson might be able to pull.

But the important thing is that this proves that the system works. Ferguson was vindicated. You lost your $100 and might think twice about doing it again. How out of this can the councillors get the idea that we need less accountability? There are no indications, and the election proved it, that anyone got misled by the Spec's coverage of the complaint. Due process means letting the system work. Council seems to be so worried about people mistaking an allegation for a conviction that they're proposing that we get rid of due process altogether.



Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds