Comment 74375

By Simon (registered) - website | Posted February 14, 2012 at 16:17:38

Finally - we have a breakdown of the weighted scoring model. I was going to start to nit-pick at it - but I thing the point, as has been raised is that it is fairly arbitrary and only useful to narrow selection down to the top options.

The board gets this right on their website when they say "It is important to note that the site criteria was not the sole determinant used to select a future site for the Education Centre. The criteria was used to identify and narrow down the top 10 sites. Those sites were then examined in more detail regarding availability as well as program suitability. From there, the Board directed administration to develop business cases on its top three sites".

HOWEVER

  1. Renovating and expanding their existing site appears to have never been analyzed.

  2. Ranked #1 Crestwood, #4 Jerome and #9 West Harbour are selected as finalists. Jackson Square is dropped all together - as is #7 City Hall. No explanation - except apparently City Hall "compromises program needs"

So where is the report, meeting minutes, discussion records that address the missing information?

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds