Comment 73486

By Argy Bargy (anonymous) | Posted January 30, 2012 at 04:49:57

I would love to see this happen, and I agree that there are no logical deterrents thereto. The one main hindrance I that McMaster has no credible history of architectural preservation or inspired example of adaptive reuse. The closest precedent -- nay, maybe the only precedent –– is their rework of the old Camco building into MIP. And that was pretty inelegant. Still, where there's a will...

What's the deal with the provincial funding component? Are there any conditions attached on that end in terms of residency dates?

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools