Comment 73452

By highwater (registered) | Posted January 28, 2012 at 14:37:05 in reply to Comment 73450

If memory serves, the second tower was intended to go directly behind the first and form a mirror image. If we're going to be consistent in our approach to preserving our architectural heritage, then it doesn't make alot of sense to waste the pre-existing foundations, and ignore Roscoe's original vision, to spare some trees and landscaping that are easily and inexpensively replaced.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools