There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By -Hammer- (registered) | Posted July 26, 2011 at 19:04:33 in reply to Comment 66921
Mr. Jelly, your response to my post has further validated why I voted for you last election. Unlike some who would dismiss an opposing viewpoint, you have picked exactly what we agree on and build upon it and noted the differences of opinion and have politely stated understanding but clarified your position without preaching the other position as wrong.
I do completely agree that the Brutalist architecture is a blight upon Hamilton (particularly the Convention Center). As far as the adaptive reuse, I don't see a lot of potential, save for maybe the ground floor. I have doubts the facility has proper internal infrastructure (adequate piping, support structures for expansion, etc) that would make adapting the building fiscally desirable for modern medical facility. I think you have to pick your battles though and there are better battles to pick then this one.
I do agree though, it certainly is within McMaster's means to purchase another piece of property. The problem though they need incentives to build where the city desires them to build (AKA: The Core). I do feel the city is doing the right thing by offering incentive to McMaster to build in the core. It doesn't have to be at the cost of a building that I personally find unsightly, but others appreciate. I just can't support such a movement because I don't want to see this tired building any longer. This facility could be built easily in the mass of parking around John and Wilson (next to planned parkland). However concern must also be raised that if the board of education does move from this location, what use could this building serve?
Thank you for clarifying the last point though. I do agree surface parking in the core is a big problem. I though you were specifically implying to build it at the old federal building location, which may finally see something go up although I'm cautiously optimistic on that one. Lets give Vranich another chance, if only to say to developers that we are willing to give such a chance.
As you stated though, we have differences of opinion on architecture. I only find parts of the ground floor of this structure appealing. The rest of it, well I already stated what I think of it's appearance. I would much prefer a more modern building in our core.
Comment edited by -Hammer- on 2011-07-26 19:08:11
Still waiting for the Randle Reef mess to get cleaned up, but hopefully not much longer!
http://www.cbc.ca/hamilton/news/story/2012/12/18/hamilton-randle-reef-announcement.html
Permalink | Context