There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By lawrence (registered) - website | Posted July 20, 2011 at 14:19:59
Great piece Graham and good answers from Councillor Jackson.
One question I have, is why won't Metrolynx state now how much they would expect Hamilton to pay to build this? If we are going to the trouble of doing all this planing and then the province/feds say they'll split 70%, Metrolynx will throw down 20%, leaving Hamilton required to pay 10% and we are talking ballpark $850M - $1B overall project cost, than we are looking at minimal $850K out of local taxpayers pockets in that scenerio?
We walked into the stadium debate capped at $45M. If it's stated that we will have to pay some upfront costs now, what is our cap? Councillor Ferguson states that $100M to $200M might be a problem, so what does council think would be a reasonable amount taxpayers could come to grips with? A $100M to $750M cost share would seem very appealing; especially where the long term benefits to our city are concerned.
Maybe, if it came down to a committement requried from Hamilton that council didn't feel taxpayers would be okay with, that a decision as vital as this one could be opened up to a municipal vote?
"I know we promised not to raise taxes, but for $125/yr added to your assessment, these are the numbers in jobs and revenue, and savings from urban renewal versus suburban expansion, that would benefit your city."
Provide voters with a link to this with some point form facts on LRT, including links to LRT articles on RTH and The Spec as well. Give them the pros and cons on a nice 5x7 voter card, with voting station location and hours on the back.
Why put the brakes on something you 'believe', voters won't go for? Why not know for sure? It would be interesting to see if nothing else, the difference between number of citizens voting for one innitiative, rather than a specific person for office?
For those that feel it doesn't matter who they vote for, nothing will ever change, they might feel differently when they are given the opportunity to vote on this very important issue.
Comment edited by lawrence on 2011-07-20 14:27:03
Ward 3 Trustee for HWDSB.
Permalink | Context