There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By d.knox (registered) | Posted July 05, 2011 at 08:38:15
Public policy is driven by philosophy. That's just the way it is. One person's solution to increasing social assistance numbers is to throw more money at the problem. Another's is to cut funding. Another's is to put conditions on the funding.
I don't see the benefit of putting aside personal experience in favour of "good empirical evidence" when we aren't actually talking about the same problem. Do we want to make life easier for people on social assistance - give them better health care and easier access to housing - or do we want to make life harder for people on social assistance so that it is less of a viable option for them to stay on social assistance? The former option hasn't worked out so well for Britain, and any reading of Theodore Dalrymple's essays will give you lots of personal anecdotes to supplement the empirical evidence of the success of the welfare state in Britain.
What is good for people on social assistance is not necessarily good for Hamilton.
It's very hard to talk about solving the problem when we can't agree on what the problem is. What we do know is that low-cost housing attracts poor people. Yes - attracts. A density of poverty attracts social services which in turn attracts more people who need social services which increases the density of poverty. I don't need to lecture anyone on how Hamilton has fared on this measure. WINNING.
At this point, philosophy takes over.
Here's where I'm coming from: Hamilton has lower rents and housing costs than all other cities that are as well-serviced or better serviced in Ontario; Hamilton has cheaper bus fares than most other cities with as many services; Hamilton has shorter wait times for subsidized housing than many other cities with as many services; Hamilton also has the highest property taxes of any other city with as many services. There is a correlation that is more than coincidental.
Hamilton does not have greater moral imperative than any other city in Ontario to take care of poor people. So, until all of the costs for social services are shared equally by everyone in this province, we should stop stepping up to the plate to do more. We have done enough.
Permalink | Context