Comment 64840

By Gary Santucci (anonymous) | Posted June 13, 2011 at 08:24:05

Who says that the topography of a park should be flat, by declaring the embankment surplus? The City's legal department's stamp is all over this one. We can't have children rolling down the embankment in the summer and of course we can't have them sliding down in the winter. Has the City violated its own policy for the sale of lands deemed surplus? Has it been listed on their site? Why not offer the developer a land swap for a surface parking lot where they can develop a larger project with more underground parking that could service the residents and other members of the public. This of course will not happen as the location is a very desirable one and all of the interests seem to have aligned, leaving the residents and the growing number of children on the bottom looking up!

Gary Santucci

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds