Comment 63408

By Joe Minor (anonymous) | Posted May 11, 2011 at 20:24:57 in reply to Comment 63406

I have looked at the link, and I am unimpressed by the way public comments are being handled by the consultant. It is something less than honest to say "66% support a multi-use pathway" while hiding an asterisk eight lines above and hiding the explanation of the asterisk on a later page. After sorting through the layers of deceit, it becomes clear that the consultant counted "No Preference" as "Support". It is likely that the number of people no "don't support" a multi-use pathway actually outnumber those who "support" it. A raised pathway, paved or not, will disrupt water flows to the natural areas.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools