Comment 63188

By A Smith (anonymous) | Posted May 07, 2011 at 11:09:19 in reply to Comment 63187

>> How do you know that the baby doesn't come from a rape?

So because an innocent baby is created through force (I agree, that is evil), it then means the baby is evil as well and is deserving of being killed? Why not take something bad (violence) and turn it into something good (love)?

>> That the baby doesn't have a congenital defect that will make it impossible to survive?

Yes, if a baby has massive birth defects and it is 100% clear it won't survive, then it makes sense to remove the baby.

>> That the mother doesn't have a medical issue?

I agree. If a woman is almost certain to die from carrying a baby, then it makes more sense to save at least one life, rather than have both mother and child die.

>> And like so many "right to lifers", you're perfectly willing to force the child to be born, but then they're on their own, aren't they?

You're correct. If a person fights against abortion, but then doesn't ensure that babies are also cared for in the formative years, they are a hypocrite.

Funny, you never answered my questions, so here they are again...

1) Do you consider unborn children to be unique people, or are they simply part of the woman?

2) If you do consider them unique human beings, then what right does anyone have to attack those unborn human beings, especially if they aren't a medical threat to the woman?

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds