Comment 62208

By Kiely (registered) | Posted April 13, 2011 at 15:06:07 in reply to Comment 62122

I have and it is.

They have some very good ideas (and a couple awful ones) but as a whole I see it as a recipe for disaster. The notion that a bunch of first time MPs are going to be able to pull off what is in their platform (and there is very little explanation of "How?" in their platform) is pure fantasy.

They think we can drastically and simultaneously change our infrastructure, economy and our roll in international affairs. I simply can't agree. We can become a sustainable eco-friendly economy OR we can maintain our roll in the global economy. They seem to think we can pull a borderline Chavez and still have a seat at the G20... good luck with that.

If they said - We can nationalize our resources, become a sustainable eco-friendly self sufficient country and outside of some humanitarian efforts have minimal to no involvement in international affairs (i.e., no more NAFTA, no more NATO, no more UN peace keeping) then I might believe them.

What they are proposing is that we can continue to have our cake and eat it too as long as the icing is green. That is hogwash.

But if they do come to power I will put my name in for their "National Treasures Program" : )

http://kiely-flashpoint.blogspot.com/201...

Comment edited by Kiely on 2011-04-13 15:07:30

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds