Comment 56578

By Simmons (registered) | Posted January 17, 2011 at 08:37:26

Not sure if there was one fact in that non-sensical rant by hammy. But thanks for the laugh.

Bob Young and the mayor are on record as saying the only difference between IWS and WH is "simple costs." With that being the case, Paul is simply providing ample evidence as to why WH can work for the same amount of money promised to the new Ivor Wynne.

Unfortunately we're much too late in the game, I fear, to look at another plan. Shame the Ticats hijacked the process from the beginning and lied about their reasons of not wanting WH. Shame a few councillors, namely mine -- Whitehead -- were fooled into thinking the Cats would actually leave and were played by Young and Co.

Comment edited by Simmons on 2011-01-17 08:41:47

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds