There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By seancb (registered) - website | Posted January 12, 2011 at 10:47:04
Mayor and council,
All of a sudden IWS is a suitable location for Bob Young! Sounds like it could be a great compromise.
But what are his motivations? Considering it underperforms WH on every single metric that Young touted as "WH deal killers" before, we should ask some questions before diving in.
First and foremost, is this a sign that the cats have nowhere else to go? And if so, then wouldn't it be prudent to consider that if we move forward with the plan that the citizens of hamilton support in vast majority - the one that we have voted over and over to approve, the ticats will have no choice but to come to the table and play at west harbour - their only other (extremely unlikely) option being to fold completely?
Why is this proposal costing so much on land that we already own - which needs minimal if any remediation?
Are the TiCats providing ANY funding for this? Or are we giving the whole thing to them as a gift?
How much surrounding land will become surface parking?
How much surrounding land will be developed in "big box store" style at profit to Bob Young?
What are the terms of the 20 year lease?
What happens to the WH land we already own? Will BY stand behind his previous promises to help fund that? If not, how will we afford to fix that land if we blow all of our funding on IWS?
Who gets to share in ancillary revenues? parking, concessions, etc?
Is there any tax income benefit to the city under this plan?
Does this accomplish any of our city building goals?
How does this affect Hamilton's amateur sport legacy?
Will we be able to build a permanent velodrome?
We had better get answers to these and more before even considering this last ditch plug.
Short of positive answers to all of these questions, I implore you - please vote for a scalable WH stadium. The Ticats WILL come to the table once we show them our strength as a city.
Don't let your citizens down. How many times do we have to speak before our voices are heard?
I vote down for offensiveness and up for humour. I cast no votes based on my level of agreement.
Permalink | Context