There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By RenaissanceWatcher (registered) | Posted January 09, 2011 at 13:28:29
Hamilton city council will make a once in a generation decision for its citizens on January 12, 2011.
Council has three options:
The following seven factors, in no particular order, need to be considered carefully by city council in making their decision:
The cost and complexity of remediating the 23 acre west harbour brownfield lands to build residences would be much higher than the cost and complexity of remediating the lands to build the Pan Am stadium and velodrome.
The risk of future liability to the City of Hamilton in trying to sell remediated brownfield lands to developers to build residences on these lands would also be higher than the city retaining ownership of these lands.
Federal and provincial funding is available right now for 56 per cent of the construction costs of a scalable 6,000 seat Pan Am stadium and a velodrome on this property. If the City of Hamilton passes on this opportunity, how many years will it take to secure private and/or public funding to build anything on these lands?
As noted in a previous post, the west harbour Pan Am facilities would provide Hamilton the opportunity to become the home base for a number of Canada’s national soccer youth developmental teams, a possible soccer hub for southwestern Ontario, an indoor cycling hub for eastern Canada and the northeast United States, and facilities for community use by all Hamiltonians and young Hamiltonians in the lower city in particular.
The reduction of the stadium seating capacity to 6,000 will greatly reduce the traffic impact upon the surrounding neighbourhoods in comparison to the originally contemplated 25,000 seat stadium.
The construction of west harbour Pan Am facilities would probably expedite full GO train service to Hamilton.
Having the Pan Am facilities at the west harbour will display our restored waterfront to out-of-town Canadians and visitors from the other 41 Pan Am nations and hopefully provide some much needed esteem into the Hamilton community as well as a renewed interest in downtown development.
We have now reached a crucial moment where Hamiltonians must decide what is best for Hamilton. The construction of the scalable west harbour Pan Am stadium and the velodrome (Option 1) is probably the best use the city can achieve for those brownfield lands given the limited resources this city has. Equally important is that this option recaptures most of the city building benefits envisioned by the City of Hamilton in February, 2009 when it first decided to financially participate in the Toronto 2015 Pan Am Games bid.
Good luck to Hamilton city council in making the decision that brings the most benefit to its citizens.
Comment edited by RenaissanceWatcher on 2011-01-09 13:33:54
Permalink | Context