There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By Pxtl (registered) - website | Posted October 13, 2010 at 15:35:37
Has anybody really sat down and taken a look at what it would take to get Ivor Wynne up to the standards needed to make the TiCats profitable, if that's possible at all? I keep coming back to the fact that it's really the only location that is
1) in the lower city and accessible to transit, which seems to be the city's big must-have.
2) has parking (assuming Scott Park is expendable in its current semi-abandoned state) and accessibility to the expressways and other major thoroughfares.
I mean yes, we know the problems with Ivor Wynne. It has uncomfortable seats, it's crammed in the middle of a residential area, and has no parking.
But a hundred million dollars is a lot of money. It can buy a lot of seats. It can build a lot of parking on an old school grounds. In a pinch, it can buy up a city block of houses in a depressed area.
Has Ivor Wynne really been measured? Is it entirely an emotional problem? After all, the cats obviously need to re-invent themselves to be profitable... a renovated stadium isn't enough of a "reinvention" to get new fans since old no-shows will still think of them as "the Cats at IW"?
@Brandon
I think Young has always been diplomatic when he discards the WH parking, because he doesn't want to say the actual problem: he needs to get more suburbanites into his stadium, he needs to charge more money.
Suburbanites want a stadium that looks and works like a trip to a theme park - you drive along the expressway, get off at the offramp that says "Nabsico Stadium" drive into the parking lot, pay your parking, and walk into the stadium that looms over the lot. They want it work like going to Costco, but with paid parking. Just like it works back home in Burlington, Mississauga, Stoney Creek mountain, etc.
They're not going to stand for driving through Hamilton, hunting for a parking lot staffed by a sketchy guy with a pricing system that you can't figure out (wait, if it's $6 maximum for all day, and $3 for evenings, and I parked for 3 hours, how are you charging me $7.50? Just because I crossed the 6pm threshold?) and so on. He wants to just offer them a nice, safe package.
Because he needs them. They pay more. And his team will go broke if they can't find a way to get people to pay more.
Young can provide the needed experience at EM. He can provide it at Longwood, but he'll have to charge through the nose for parking because it'll be a small lot and he's got to tweak the supply/demand curve to keep the lot getting sold out too fast and scaring off the folks who'd rather just pay for parking than go hunting for it.
He could probably provide it at Ivor Wynne, but I think that IW's image problem might make that unacceptable.
He can't do it at WH.
Comment edited by Pxtl on 2010-10-13 14:48:12
Permalink | Context