Comment 49158

By allantaylor97 (registered) | Posted October 10, 2010 at 15:45:28

@By RenaissanceWatcher (anonymous) Posted October 10, 2010 08:06:47

That document also shows that the Future Fund is for other city building projects and that the stadium would fit in if they were only allocating 20% (social benefit) of the total $100M. Since they are allocating more than that the use of the Future Fund is dubious at best unless it can be argued that it contributes to the economic base (65%)or enhancing community life (15%) As you can see the total should be no more than $35M at the WH for the entire Pan Am Project assuming that brown field remediation is considered improving community life. Any way you look at it all options are breaking the spirit and letter of the Future Fund Priorities Statement

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds