Comment 48637

By mrjanitor (registered) | Posted October 01, 2010 at 17:09:18


I disagree that article was written by Tetley and Fallis. The author is listed as RTH staff, why is that? Because someone from RTH staff decided to post it. My personal feeling is that Mr. Tetley showed questionable judgment in having this posted here, by who we really don't know, other than it's RTH staff. You CANNOT accurately say this was written by both parties, as one person most likely assumed this was a private discussion.

I also disagree you can call this little tantrum of Mr. Tetley's blog worthy, unless you are one of his sycophants. I do not think this article is biased towards Paul Tetley, I think the current focus of the leaders of this site is. That's OK, I don't think for a second anyone is claiming otherwise, but let's call a duck a duck.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools