Comment 46207

By cd (anonymous) | Posted August 24, 2010 at 20:38:10

"Is it "respectful" to dismiss WH supporters as "Leftists" and "socialists"?"

How am I disrespecting any viewpoint by calling it Leftist? I also used the terms New Urbanism and 'communitarian'. I might even throw in 'populist' as well & refer to the pro WH movement as a grassroots sort of activism aimed at undermining what it sees as the oligarchy of big business and municipal policy. These are all very respectable philosophies with which I'm not all that unsympathetic myself. I apologize if my tone's been seen as dismissive in any way.

Fred's used the expression "socialist stadium" as a nice way to introduce vital political divisions into the debate. A contemporary political theorist uses the term "conflictual tension" to characterize a true (healthy)democratic government: people ought to be passionately divided along ideological lines in order to ensure that any dissenting voice, whether from the Left or Right, not be seen by an overriding consensus as unfit to be heard.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds