Comment 45143

By seancb (registered) - website | Posted August 08, 2010 at 11:42:46

I don't understand how the ticats can be considered a legacy tenant in the sense that a legacy tenant makes the stadium financially sustainable.

Am I the only one who remembers that the only way the ticats remain sustainable themselves is through ongoing taxpayer subsidies?

Now we are to believe that the ticats will suddenly not only become profitable, but become SO profitable that they alone will carry the costs of a brand new stadium? Good luck.

We would be in better financial shape without the cats.

I'd like to hear how all of the fanatical ticat supporters on here would feel if they actually had to pay ticket prices that would make the team sustainable. My guess is that their blind support would wane significantly.

We need to call the cats out on this sustainability issue. How can anyone take this tax drain of an organization's threats seriously?

I vote down for offensiveness and up for humour. I cast no votes based on my level of agreement.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds