Comment 43373

By highwater (registered) | Posted July 15, 2010 at 12:16:30

Why can't the parking of the EMED be constructed with water permiable surfaces, that obsorb the rain water into the soil below, like our front lawns do?

Because conventional surface parking is already going to cost us $24,000,000 (of which Mr. Young is only offering to pay $15m), and now you want to go with the luxury model? I thought you were all about fiscal responsibility, MAW.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds