There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By Fred Street (anonymous) | Posted July 08, 2010 at 16:26:00
Yesterday's $74 million headline reminds me that most journalists are innumerate.
If nothing else, you'd hope that the Spec would subtract the $10 million pledged toward THE OLD STADIUM.
Or the $5 million spent on a soccer team.
Or the $14 million that will go into pursuing two Grey Cup bids.
Or, if they were feeling especially like forensic accountants, the $30 million bid for rights to a decade of virgin facility management, which I have to imagine would net the club all revenues associated with the stadium (and possibly allow them to set their own rent). Without an RFP or bidding cycle, how do we know what management rights are worth? (I know CFL business performance is prepubescent compared to that of the NFL, but as a "for example," Indianapolis had a dozen bidders hustling for management of Lucas Oil Stadium and the Indiana Convention Center earlier this year. Yet we're not even expected to flip a coin?)
Whether they're for or against the Hannon site, most people seem to agree that Young's offer, true to his promise of "millions or tens of millions," amounts to kicking in $15 million of the roughly $50 million that the city needs to build the stadium with a 25,000-30,000 capacity.
That's assuming the city doesn't scale back their investment based on the east mountain's elimination of the remediation/downtown stimulus/harbour vision rationale that convinced the majority of council to drain the Future Fund. If, at the very least, they commit to remediating the Rheem site, which seems likely, that widens the funding gap. If they throw downtown a sop as well, that's another shortfall. And then there are the "extras" like the road infrastructure and parking facilities, which could add another $10-20 million to the price tag.
Any question of architectural quality or humanizing design will hinge on the private sector closing the $50 million-$60 million gap that was flagged all those months ago (or, I concede, city politicians introducing tax levies to raise the funds). Hopefully the business sector steps up promptly on August 12, or this may just be 2015's answer to Civic Stadium.
Permalink | Context