There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By Borrelli (registered) | Posted June 30, 2010 at 14:47:08
Interesting comments posted above. I am working with some colleagues of mine involved in social justice groups and labour unions to try to talk to social movement org's and a few labour unions about looking at alternative models of mobilization, so I appreciate any comments or criticism. A few comments in response:
Kiely: "But the real problem is the people." --> Agreed, but that's sort of what I'm trying to draw attention to here. Democracy requires some mass agreement around issues, and clearly there is no sound consensus around many of the issues discussed at the G20, hence protesting. However, the goal of protesting can't simply be an expression of frustration, anger, and grievances. People don't change their opinions in response to those emotions--they are more likely to stand firm with those opinions. Protest has to constructively bring more people onside in an effort to secure a majority opinion. What we have seen since Seattle is that public images of violence alienate the massive chunk of the public who abhor violence (even violence to property). That's why I think constructive coalition/community building is of more importance than symbolic protests that feature violence, even tangentially.
Undustrial: "There is a fundamental unwillingness to cover radical issues or perspectives within the media, no matter how they're being brought up, or how much evidence they have." --> Good point, but I don't see that as a justification to continue with business-as-usual. Media are MORE than willing to cover blood-soaked stories involving conflict, and one story like that goes a lot further to colour public perceptions of social justice activists than 10 stories about successful fundraisers for Africa. Consider: Sunday night after a weekend of coverage, 60% of readers on the Toronto Star's website, a liberal bastion if there was one, believed the police response to protesters on Sunday was appropriate. Only ~40% were convinced it was heavy handed, with 14,000 or so votes cast. That's shocking to me, and I think that says a lot. Worse still, it goes some way to legitimize state violence against citizens with alternative ideas.
Mike: "Of course people should be discussing real issues socially. This is (at least partially) what living in a society is about. But an alternative to protests or assembly? I don't think so." --> Not an alternative to those, Mike, an alternative to mega-protests in the Seattle model. Those have become, at best, violent stalemates. What I'm arguing is that more good can be accomplished by 10 or 100 small protests that bring together communities, than mega-protests that have turned into adrenaline-fueled, set-piece battles with security forces. Do you know what I think was the most successful protest/assembly all weekend long, from both a moral AND public relations standpoint? The semi-spontaneous one (abetted by Twitter) the next day in front of Police HQ. After all the stormtroopers went home, the eyes and ears of the City were finally on real citizens who had their civil liberties violated during the summit, not burning cop cars and broken windows.
Thanks again for the input--I'm happy to receive it--it is great food for thought.
Permalink | Context