There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By Howard Elliott (anonymous) | Posted June 04, 2010 at 20:31:33
I did not intend to get involved in anything other than a one-time statement of our thinking. Typically, in forums such as this, the anti-MSM outcome is pre-determined, so it seems pointless.
That said, there are some thoughtful comments here, so I feel I should respond to them, in fairness and to be polite.
Ben:
'However, my take on the RTH commentators critisism of this incident is: Why did Andrew (and the Spec) choose to go this route? If I am a public figure and someone makes an outlandish and unsubstantiated allegation against me which, while it may be defamatory, is not likely to 'stick' - why would I make an issue out of it?'
All I can tell you is Andrew believed the comments were unfair and out of line, and he wished to write a column about the incident. I agreed, so we did it. It's not a matter of whether it sticks or not, it's a matter of whether such unsubstantiated comments should have been allowed in a public forum in the first place. As you said yourself, legally, it crosses the line. So why would it be a surprise that we chose to respond?
As for your suggestion that we could have simply asked for the 'grievance' to be addressed, I did that and nothing happened.
Was Andrew genuinely hurt? I think so. Wouldn't you be if someone made you out to be a racist in a public forum?
Frankly, I was at least as upset as Andrew. The idea that someone would paint The Spectator as being racially intolerant is ludicrous. We are not perfect by any means. But we have received an award from SISO for being an inclusive employer. Thanks to the efforts of our managing editor, news, Jim Poling, The Spec had the first and only internationally-trained journalist internship program, which led to Sheridan College starting the first program in Canada with the goal of assisting and re-training internationally trained journalists. I am proud to be the co-chair of Hamilton's Centre for Civic Inclusion, an organization with the goal and mandate of making the city as welcoming to newcomers as it can possibly be, and I'm also proud to sit on the local Immigration Partnership Council, developing a Hamilton-based immigration strategy.
So are we sensitive about being labeled as racially intolerant? Yes.
Finally, we do not communicate with a lawyer at hand. But when we're made out to be racist or racially intolerant, we do respond as we feel appropriate. I make no apologies for that. We may have many sins, but that is not one of them.
Respectfully,
Howard
(Apologies for bad spelling. I'm at home and without usual tools.)
Permalink | Context