There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By Howard Elliott (anonymous) | Posted June 04, 2010 at 15:36:37
Ryan:
For the record, here is our take on what happened. It’s pretty simple.
If we published something that called, or even implied, someone is a racist, we would almost certainly be sued. Unless we could prove it was true, we would lose. There is ample precedent in Canadian law for such litigation.
That is what this has been about since the outset. It’s not about telling people what to think or read, protecting or filtering. It’s about allowing someone to make a false claim that defames another individual. When you published the post, I wrote you and said quite clearly that we have no reason or interest in influencing anyone’s behaviour, however we objected, strongly, to one of our employees being called a racist. All we ever hoped for, or asked, was that the allegation of racism be removed.
Andrew decided to write a column on the subject after discussing it with me and our lawyer. The purpose for having our lawyer involved was to make sure we were speaking accurately about what the law says. I can assure you, we never had any intent of taking legal action against you. That wouldn’t be a productive use of our time or resources.
We felt, and continue to feel, that fair comment is one thing, but there are limits that one should not be able to exceed, and calling someone a racist does so. Had the racist allegation been removed prior to posting or after once I complained, there would have been no issue.
There is no neutral carrier defence in Canada. Once an editor, be it a print editor or blog editor, makes a conscious decision to publish something, the editor/organization assumes legal as well as ethical responsibility for the content. That is not my opinion, or a reality I particular enjoy. It is clear Canadian law, period. Realizing you probably won’t believe this coming from me, I’d encourage you to check for yourself. There is one rule, and it applies to all of use, equally.
I continue to enjoy reading your blog (notwithstanding the constant MSM-bashing, some of which is unfair and inaccurate.) I know many other Spec people are also followers, and we all appreciate the work you’ve done and will continue to do to make Hamilton a better city.
Howard Elliot
Managing Editor
The Hamilton Spectator
Permalink | Context