Comment 40588

By realitycheck (anonymous) | Posted May 08, 2010 at 23:16:07

If remediation of the former Rheem site will only cost $3-5 million dollars as the mayor claims then why are we spending $60 million to develop a tenantless stadium on the site? Why not simply clean the lands up and repurpose it as urban residential? Instead of pulling $20 million out of the Future Fund for a stadium of uncertain viability, what not take a fifth of that out, remediate the land, then repurpose it more appropriately as urban residential?

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools