There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By More roads (anonymous) | Posted March 26, 2010 at 18:54:37
canbyte, "You have to get beyond the rhetoric and beyond thinking of the sellers to thinking of the buyers. Why should they raise their offers?"
Because they want to make money. Downtown Hamilton property owners would charge 10X as much as they do today, but there are no buyers. That's why the city should step in and act as buyer of last resort.
By buying up vacant and under utilized properties, the city would increase the demand side of the equation. When you increase demand and you hold supply steady, what happens to prices? They increase.
The city wouldn't even have to buy properties cheap, or use eminent domain, because that would actually work against the goal, which is to increase prices. That would appear to be what Santa Ana did, they wanted land and if they could convince people to sell cheap, they were happy.
Santa Ana also appears to want to control development, not something I am advocating. All I want is to create an environment where developers can build and make a profit. If you can create those conditions, in part by controlling the level of supply, developers will seek us out, not the other way around.
..."Isn't it just derelict owned by city?"
Yes, except if the goal is to increase the demand for land and land prices, the city would be sitting on an asset that would increase over time.
..."Why don't we just pool our resources and buy these places ourselves?"
Because that would not decrease the supply of usable floor space. For example, if you bought the Royal Connaught, your goal would be to make money by renting it out. If the city bought it, it could afford to take it off the market and watch as other properties increased in value. As these assessments went up, so would city tax revenue per property, plus the land that they own would not be paying tax.
The best thing about having the city buy back this undervalued land is that it would bring stability to the market. For example, if the city felt that land prices were rising too fast, they could sell some off and bring prices down. By acting as a counter balance to the market, it would reduce the problems associated when fear and greed take over people's minds. Think of the city acting like a parent, encouraging growth, but also imparting wisdom and discipline when necessary.
Permalink | Context