Comment 38835

By frank (registered) | Posted March 17, 2010 at 13:08:15

Capitalist, the point is that if the city is concerned about the buildings from a structural safety standpoint then they should've been demolished however if they aren't decrepit (sp?) (and if I'm not mistaken, they weren't) then if the city is actually interested in urban renewal they should have made it their job to ensure those buildings were sold to investors willing to upgrade/renew them, not come up with a plan to bulldoze for the sake of bulldozing.

If the options are put up or shut up, then no forward progress would ever have been made. Just because a person doesn't have the means to do something doesn't mean they should keep their opinions to themselves. The fact that people are talking about it may be enough to cause someone with the capital to do something about it to come forward. Get a grip...

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools