There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By Imperial (anonymous) | Posted September 15, 2009 at 21:19:25
Hey Folks
Thankfully I've been too busy at a property inspection at a building in the core that my partner and I are considering as our first home to witness this splendid conversation as it happened. Some higlights and some real low points from my perspective.
I think what is needed here is a little breather. We're all DEMANDING things out of our City and city, politicians and core, community and businesses, and making wild assumptions about each others desires and actions. This is dangerous stuff. Why? Because it creates a divided community with polarized priorities oftentimes based on false statements and assumptions. Dangerous stuff.
I'm glad to see people expressing what they want Hamilton to become and what it deserves to be. I spend just about every waking moment working on projects that I feel are bringing Hamilton closer to what I want it to be.
More often than not when I see something like this happen its because the process is broken not the project.
Most of this conversation has been focused on who should live downtown, where should poor people go, etc. WRONG FOCUS. The focus should be on:
Who made this decision?
What process did they take to get to it?
How is this decision moving Hamilton towards our new vision?
Does the decision or process reflect the values of Vision 2020, Places to Grow, etc?
If the project can be analyzed in this way it wouldn't turn into a me vs. you, poor vs. rich, college educated vs. life experience, etc. Those kinds of arguments draw lines based on assets not principles.
If the Connaught project was subjected to the same public process that my organizations Building a Creative Catalyst project is I'm sure the outcome would be beneficial to the community.
We want public funds so we go through the process - Mr. Spallacci should be subjected to the same scrutiny. It would be nothing short of a miracle if we received $12 million for our project, but I'm certain it would meet the collective values of the community as a project worthy of our core.
Focus on poking holes in the process folks - not the people.
Jeremy
(does not have university degree and lives about 4 blocks from the Connaught)
Permalink | Context