There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By A Smith (anonymous) | Posted February 17, 2009 at 13:52:37
Frank, >> Your one horse act is getting really tiring
Right back at ya. Does every article and comment have to look to government and politicians to fix Hamilton's poverty problem?
Mr.Meister, >> A Smith is a fanatic, plain and simple. There is no thought process, rationale, common sense or reality in his arguments.
The rationale is quite simple. When you lower the cost of owning property (by decreasing tax rates), you increase the demand for property. When you increase demand, you increase the price people are willing to pay for property, which increases the nominal price.
Both Burlington and Oakville charge lower "tax rates" on property and surprise, surprise, their property is in higher demand, as reflected in the higher market prices people are willing to pay.
Do you get it yet? When you give people a better deal on tax rates, it increases the amount of people who will want to buy property in the community. Keeping tax rates 50-100% higher than neighbouring communities will do the exact opposite. It also explains why buildings sit empty, a sure sign of lack of demand.
JonC >> As for the vacant buildings, we already covered that they pay less tax than other cities and thus corporations can sit around on them paying peanuts in taxation, since the sites have no value as is.
Oakville charges a tax rate of 2.34% on commercial properties and a reduced figure of 1.64% on vacant commercial properties. Hamilton charges 4.57% on commercial properties and a reduced 3.2% on vacant. Furthermore, Burlington charges 2.5% on commercial properties.
As you can see, Hamilton charges businesses twice what Oakville and Burlington does, not less.
>> I wish such a well schooled economist as A Smith could provide the numbers from his years of study that indicate the ideal level of property taxation
A good start would be to match Oakville and Burlington. They have already proven that a community can raise adequate revenues for public services by using lower tax rates, so we don't have to reinvent the wheel, just follow their example.
Permalink | Context