There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By highwater (registered) | Posted February 14, 2009 at 15:34:16
Hi again Three,
I invite you again to click on the above link to get a fuller picture of the situation. The PC has been working with the city and doing everything it can right from the get go. The city has often been less than forthright, claiming their investigations were based on 'complaints', when in fact they were based on internal miscommunication between departments - a prime example of the dysfunction I was referring to. Staff have more power and discretion than you give them credit for. It's all too easy to hide behind the 'rules'.
You are correct that parking requirements have been waived in certain situations in the past. That's one of the things that makes this situation so maddening. The city has given no indication that it is willing to do that in this case, which is one of the reasons why a costly zoning application is a waste of resources.
You keep coming back to lobbying council, so I'll say it again. Council IS being lobbied, to little avail up until now. They will be voting on a new official plan that will make the zoning application redundant - again, redundant zoning applications are a tremendous waste of a non-profit organization's limited resources. It is completely unfair to characterize PC's reluctance to pursue it as "A real bother. Too much trouble", as though they were just being lazy. If as you suggest, an application must still be made after the zoning changes are in place (not sure why that would be), and they can be assured that the parking requirements will be waived, I'm sure they wouldn't have a problem proceeding at that time, but at the moment it would be pointless.
Yes. Far more heroic to be silent and apathetic.
Balance wrote
Fletcher, is that you? Morelli? If not, I'd love to know how you can "guarantee" this. As I said above, the city has given no indication that they are willing to waive the requirements in this case.
Their home and livelihood is at stake, and you begrudge them their democratic recourse to the fourth estate?
Permalink | Context