There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By A Smith (anonymous) | Posted January 23, 2009 at 19:56:54
LL, the Amazon is worth what people are willing to pay for it, no more and no less. Therefore, if it is as important to human beings as you say it is, this will be reflected in the market price. As far as the native population goes, I don't favour the idea of kicking them out, in fact I would like to see them be given ownership in large tracts of this land, if not most of it.
However, once this legal title was given to them, they would also be free to sell it on the open market, or develop it themselves. The point is that land be owned by "someone" and not everyone. When property is made private, people tend to manage assets with an eye towards making money and that includes protecting the land from destruction.
I am happy for you that you have been championing decentralization for as long as you have, but you're way off the mark as far as abolishing private property. Without private property, there is no incentive to work hard or take risks. If my efforts are shared equally amongst the community, regardless of how much I suffer, or how little they do, do you think I will want to keep struggling? No. However, when you allow people to keep the fruits of their labour, you give them a reason to work hard. Private property, therefore, stimulates people to work hard and to bring forward new technologies that help everyone in the long term.
Corporations are indeed centralized organizations, however, the smart ones also listen to their worker's input. Therefore, while there is a chain of command in terms of making spending decisions, corporations run by ivory tower CEO's usually don't stay in business for very long. That is the difference between the free market and government. In the free market, if you make bad spending/investment decisions, you run out of money, thus limiting the overall destruction of capital. In government, spending is not based on increasing value to society, but only on keeping yourself in power. That is why you want to keep the money in the hands of the individuals, because they know what is valuable to their own lives and what isn't.
If you don't want to respond to this post, nobody is forcing you, but I will write what I want. If you don't like it, too bad.
Permalink | Context