There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By Jim (anonymous) | Posted December 02, 2008 at 13:51:07
adrian seens to be Dr TEDS less able alter ego. Feel free to get a dose of reality and read the 10 pages of pre release Warren and Levy on fluoride intake and effects Iowa study.
Anyone who can read this and still find fluoridation meaningful is lost in space. Caries free status has relatively little to do with fluoride intake. fluorosis is clearly more dependant on fluoride intake. The term optimal or target intake is relatively moot as little relationship to cavities and never had science to support fact anyway and that only made sense when ingested fluorides were believed to have a beneficial effect pre eruptive for kids. Science now shows that theory invalid as topical is the mechanism.
To read the study and support fluoridation requires a disfunction in processing data. The CDC data showed this years ago as did the WHO comparing different fluoridating and non fluoridating countries. No Difference in caries declines.
The New Zeland data clearly shows decline slope was never altered in slightest by fluoridation or fluoride toothpaste as did not for release to public overall data showing ZERO overall differences in cavities by fluoridation. Income yes and thus you could design study to prove anything if you have total control of process. The Fluoride promoter was fired when he spilled the truth it was all a fraud.
Your superficial study of some abstracts impresses none that have read the studies or the transcrips of how the deception went on behind closed doors.
The Nteu280.org talked about a grievance over the 2 plus 2 =7 issue. EPA management had directed that it is the scientists job provide data to support management with data to prove 2+2=7 if asked. That is why outside contractors are hired to reevaluate(alter)negative reports to support policy of fluoridation. I agree with the EPA scientists that fraud is going on at the EPA by design. Ditto for CDC and FDA even more so with drug approvals by panels with conflicts of interests and ready for big pharma jobs as rewards for approvals. This is not arms length -The design is flawed to fail the public.
Permalink | Context