Comment 27658

By Jim (anonymous) | Posted December 01, 2008 at 22:19:19

We have thousands of scientists and professionals at 19 EPA unions as of 29 FEB 2008 who want moratorium and goal of ZERO just like arsenic and lead. Read the history of the opposition at nteu280.org with 8 position papers and listen to experts ask congress to halt fluoridation 2000. The WHO data and CDC data clearly show decreasing cavities with ZERO relationship to ingested fluorides by fluoridation. The halo effect means uncontrolled doses to all almost impossible to control as nothing is labeled. Dental fluorosis is a biomarker for toxic overdose to about age 8 and was to never exceed 10% with 1ppm water. We now are at 50% and above and have moderate and severe damage in all areas not jus the 200,000 with over 2ppm natural who are warned to not give to kids anyway. Multiple sources means no control and if a unfluoridated area has 10% dental fluorosis then it is logical they are by other sources already getting too much ingested fluoride.
The early fluoridated toothopaste warned to no use in fluoridated areas or for kids under 6 yr until 1957. Double ,triple and more dosing is now ok.
I am still shocked at just how fluoride ignorant of current science most of the promoters are. They are clueless of the actual product and ZERO FDA approval. H2SiF6 is only co
llected to stop killing catle and crops by smokestacks but then put in our water. Not one chronic health and benefit study ever on theis toxic radioactive blend. The EPA refused to admit it had radioactive contaminates until George Glasser in 1996 got them to admit it came from a uranium mine producing 75% of the yellow cake for US until 1993. Deception is the only way these clowns do business. I read a transcript of the health department goons in Florida admitting at the plants everone called the recovery units pollution scrubbers. Maybe because they are. Regulation does not make untested toxic waste a product.
Government data showed from 1957-1968 airborne fluorides had more litagation and settlements then all other top 20 combined. It was king Kong but that stuff is what we add to our water now --Hfsa or AWWA b703-06 - Several agencies admitted never one Chronic benefit safety study yet. Poughkeepsie NY asked 3 pages of questions to 33 suppliers ---Not one answer about safe for humans or benefit. Six pages of questions for health department after refused to answer oral questions. stopped 50 years of fluoridation after waiting one year for answers. They know how to state policy and list endorsers and then hide like cowards. True con men and women as they do not read the studies. Acouple have but it is rare-very rare. Yoder K.M. 2007 at pubmed show dental professions unfit to advise as very science ignorant. !4% in Illinois and 17% Indiana understood posteruptive topical benefit. Most are in La La land with the tooth fairly with religion type belief in ingested fluoride. It is shameful. Kids need dentists to treat them and most refuse to treat the poor. Michael Easley thought it was not about the money as when he got them bigger payments and streamlined paperwork no additional dentists signed on. He thought they did not want to treat poor kids as they were tougher to deal with mostly and poor at keeping appointments. The new Levy study shows we already get too much ingested fluoride. You can generate proof of almost anything is you control the entire process and funding. Promoters can not be arms length objective.
Pit and fisure is 85% of cavities and fluoridation was never claimed to reduce this type so the huge decreases were stastically impossible if this was true. Delayed erruption and bias non controlled examiners with pressure to get good results is the formula for deception. Decreased cavities did happen for certain but also the far greater number of non fluoridated countries decreased as much or more. That is the biggest item of denial that makes the fluoridation benefit look very foolish.
Should I get a choice or should others vote medication for me? Pizzo 2007 shows no decrease in class inequities and no increase in cavuities when fluoridation ends. Tennessee has had 31 water districts stop fluoridation in the last 3 years and nebraska had 49 of 61 vote to reject fluoridation in November. Police Power of the state does not always win. Science can but only if you read it. Most dentists and doctors are on auto pilot and get the science wrong. I expect better. I expect disclosure and full transparancey not organized deception hiding known risks and 50% of kids fluoride toxic enamel damage.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds