Comment 115587

By Cycleoffice (anonymous) | Posted December 09, 2015 at 22:17:42

It's interesting that you make reference to the "Cycle Office". In reality the 'office' consists of one individual, Daryl Bender. Also, while moving Mr. Bender into Traffic Operations and Engineering makes some sense, it isn't a complete solution. New roads and reconstructed roads are designed by Engineering Services which, if I'm correct, is in a completely different division than Traffic under different management.

If better cycling infrastructure is the objective here then there needs to be better integration into where the actual design and engineering takes place. My understanding is that Traffic deals more with making changes/improvements to existing roads and not with reconstruction such as what has been done for Consession St and King St in Stoney Creek - these types of projects are the responsibility of Engineering Services.

Does anyone really know where the design responsibilities are within the City? I'm not sure that traffic is the correct part of the City to be approaching for change. Maybe the questions need to be directed elsewhere like Engineering Services or Planning? Anyone know if what I'm assuming about structure is right?

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds