There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By kevlahan (registered) | Posted May 05, 2015 at 09:44:31 in reply to Comment 111408
You are right that the Province controls the rules.
However, the tax incentive is to keep buildings empty. Owners get a tax reduction if they empty a building partially or entirely of tenants. The rebate is 30% for commercial properties and 35% for industrial properties. If they further demolish the building the tax goes even lower, to the land value.
For example, when Blanchard demolished the building at Jackson to replace it by a parking lot the taxes went from from about $77k to $7k. This tax structure encourages speculators to buy buildings and keep them empty or demolish them and sit on the land until the value rises so they can make an unearned windfall profit, or until they eventually decide to develop it themselves.
http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/refund/plt/v...
The City wanted to change the rules so the tax rebate for empty units only lasted for a year (enough time for a responsible landlord to find new tenants). After that time the tax would go back up and the owner could decide to sell if they did not want to actually lease the building. The Province wouldn't let them.
Downtown, the city has all sorts of very lucrative incentives to help pay for facade and leasehold improvements. They even offer millions in low interest loans and several years of tax breaks on new construction. There is no excuse for an ambitious and energetic owner not to improve their property and look for tenants. Unfortunately, many buildings are now empty above the ground floor (and have been for decades). This costs the city both taxes and economic and social vitality.
The current system of tax rebates with no expiry dates, and permissive demolition (especially for parking lots) encourages land speculation and costs the city many millions in property taxes and is very detrimental to the economy and liveability of downtown (especially).
This is especially anti-social and parasitical behaviour on the part of the speculators because the land value will only rise significantly if other more responsible and dynamic land owners actually develop and improve their land in the same area!
Comment edited by kevlahan on 2015-05-05 09:48:19
Permalink | Context