Comment 110710

By John Neary (registered) | Posted March 30, 2015 at 10:16:16 in reply to Comment 110709

Chris, it's not NIMBYism to ask that the podium be in front of the tower rather than the other way around. My point in mentioning those other two properties was just that a larger property allows higher rise with stepbacks. There would still be plenty of room for a fairly high building on the Tivoli property starting with 6 stories at the street, but that's not what's proposed.

The BNA is, as far as I know, the only neighbourhood association in Hamilton that's pushing back against minimum parking requirements that disincentivize mid-rise development and affordable housing.

I'm no expert, but I think that urban planning is a bit more complicated than the binary poles of "anything goes" vs. "we don't want any development in our little enclave." I'm disappointed that you've raised the NIMBY canard in response to specific, remediable issues identified not only by our neighbourhood association but also by the Planning department.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds