There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By myrcurial (registered) - website | Posted May 05, 2014 at 17:33:59
I had an enlightening conversation with a committee member.
In short - I believe that the committee understands the importance of balance between the public right to know and the individual's right to privacy regarding their personal lives. I also believe that the committee is capable of utilizing their own judgement (given that we are asking them to sit as a quasi-judicial body) to determine when to ask that observers, journalists and proxies discontinue recording/broadcast or even to have them exit the room for an in camera discussion.
The default stance of all city government must be Transparent and Accountable. When there is a requirement to reduce transparency, it should be undertaken as a grave matter. The current capriciousness of council declaring In Camera at the slightest chance of the potential that a resident would hold their feet to the fire is unbelievably wrong.
The city needs a policy that specifically permits residents, journalists, observers and proxies* to attend meetings of any committee unless there is a clearly articulated reason for an in camera session. In the case of this morning's meeting, the discussion of property standards as they relate to the Gore Park civic gong show is absolutely in the interests of all Hamiltonians. The subsequent discussions around the enforcement against residents in their primary domicile is reasonably acceptable to keep private and unreported. The professionalism of Matt and Joey is such that if you told them "please don't report verbatim on these issues" would be more than sufficient. In one paragraph, we've solved the situation cleanly and without the need to invoke an In Camera session.
If I can solve it in one paragraph, how come City Clerks can't seem to see past the end of their noses?
Yeah.
Permalink | Context