Chris Hume, the Toronto Star's resident urbanist, has written a column congratulating Hamilton for doing a good job preserving and renovating City Hall.
[City Hall] is one of those rare modernist structures that feels as fresh now as it must have in 1960 when it was completed. Designed by City Architect Stanley Roscoe - who knew that Steeltown once had a city architect? - this is a relic from a time when people viewed the world with undiluted optimism.
That's long gone now but thanks to a $55-million renovation, Hamilton City Hall has been restored, refurbished and returned to some semblance of its former self. Though not every element of the program is equally impressive, the overall result still manages to please. The building may be a relic, but it's one that appears well loved and well-cared for.
Of course, in classic Hume style, it bars no holds and fires some painful zingers:
Hamilton being Hamilton, the fact the project happened at all is remarkable. ...
This is a city that has made every mistake in the book, and has the scars to prove it. Few urban centres have managed to inflict as much damage on themselves as has Hamilton. After eviscerating its core in the 1960s and '70s, it seems to have run out of any clear sense of where it was headed and why.
He also knocks Council for replacing the building's marble facade with precast concrete. "Though the architects have done their best to match the original material, the latter is no substitute for stone."
However, he concludes on a hopeful note:
Hamilton's decision to stay and restore its City Hall bodes well for a town that has suffered serious self-esteem issues. Now, 50 years later, there's reason for optimism once again.
By Stanley (anonymous) | Posted July 08, 2011 at 10:34:27 in reply to Comment 65816
Akbar, feel free to take the general silence as to your past and future silly posts on RTH so far as an indicator that many people feel exactly the same about you.
By Akbar (anonymous) | Posted July 08, 2011 at 11:00:09 in reply to Comment 65826
I hope some members of City Hall read this and understand we do not need any more mistakes.
By Akbar (anonymous) | Posted July 08, 2011 at 10:31:52 in reply to Comment 65817
By TnT (registered) | Posted July 08, 2011 at 10:37:19
I wish Hume would take more looks at Hamilton, but he gets depressed I fear.
By Akbar Who? (anonymous) | Posted July 08, 2011 at 10:52:08 in reply to Comment 65832
By Kevin (registered) | Posted July 08, 2011 at 11:15:49
Akbar, you should have put a comma between "worry" and "man."
By Sakbar (anonymous) | Posted July 08, 2011 at 15:06:58 in reply to Comment 65846
That depends on what your meaning of "don't" is.
By Capitalist (anonymous) | Posted July 08, 2011 at 15:28:08
I very much like the look of the restored city hall. However, it would be nice if the front area had more greenspace.
By Robert D (anonymous) | Posted July 08, 2011 at 16:33:23 in reply to Comment 65870
Even though we rarely see eye to eye, I agree with you on this Capitalist.
I hope Chris comes back to Hamilton to tour the Lister Block when it's done.
By Akbar (anonymous) | Posted July 08, 2011 at 16:26:19
Even tho I got a name that some might think is from a certain cultural group, I alone have the views expressed here--nobody else from the millions of others, me only. I actually never met Chris Hume and don't really know if he's a asswipe. One guy i know met him and says he's not a asswipe. I got a problem up mine, the ass, that make me say the things that I did. When I get better I won't write this bad stuff no more. I hope RTH don't mind. Soon I start my own blog so I can say what i like, so there.
By Blackbar (anonymous) | Posted July 13, 2011 at 21:15:47 in reply to Comment 65882
Matt Jelly, ladies and gentlemen!
By just me (anonymous) | Posted July 08, 2011 at 16:49:50
It's possible the on-line Hume Hamilton city hall article we've just all read may be in the Sat. Star--it does not appear to be in the printed version Friday.
**BUT see also 'Lake Ontario’s dirtiest spot'
We asked Lake Ontario Waterkeeper’s president, Mark Mattson.
He fingered Hamilton Harbour, specifically an inlet west of the industrial section near Evans McKeil Way. Hamilton Harbour is one of the International Joint Commission’s six “areas of concern” around the lake — areas that have been “severely degraded.”
http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1022157--lake-ontario-s-dirtiest-spot
AND http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1022104--lake-of-shame-ontario-s-pollution-problem
Lake of Shame: Ontario’s pollution problem
both by Antonia Zerbisias for the Sat. Star
By George (registered) | Posted July 08, 2011 at 18:23:20
I think most of us here are aware of Randle's Reef. Not sure what relevance it has to Hume's article with regards to our city hall.
By response (anonymous) | Posted July 09, 2011 at 10:54:04 in reply to Comment 65898
Both articles are from the Sat Star, both mention Hamilton--& embarrassment over Randle's Reef won't make it or noticing it go under your carpet; and the Big papers--that do count--don't often mention 'Hamilton'. Allwas in context--the good noticed by the Star, and the not good. Don't read it if you don't like it.
By Billybong (anonymous) | Posted July 09, 2011 at 00:05:58
Hume is that faux urbanist from Toronto. Let him look at Fordville to write about. We have our own urbanist writers like....well like.....let me see, there's....oh drat....c'mon Hume write some more.
You must be logged in to comment.
There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?