Comment 95071

By Pxtl (registered) - website | Posted November 22, 2013 at 12:23:38 in reply to Comment 95069

It could be argued that the negligence was on the part of the government and not the driver for constructing the roadway/laws/vehicular standards in such a fashion that the driver's reasonable level of caution was not sufficient in avoiding hitting a lawfully-crossing pedestrian. Sadly, our legal system does not support the XOR operator (if X is not guilty therefore Y must be guilty or Z must be guilty because somebody was negligent).

Comment edited by Pxtl on 2013-11-22 12:24:05

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds