Comment 78883

By SpaceMonkey (registered) | Posted June 24, 2012 at 10:32:06 in reply to Comment 78880

Like "no continuous rings", I too believe that Ryan thinks or is at least trying to make people think that it simply "disappears". Because he didn't specify, the reader is left to their own conclusion. We all know what he wants the reader to conclude.

Is it a good thing that the traffic disperses? I suppose it depends on what is trying to be accomplished. I think I would prefer to have one very busy street for cars and lots of quiet, safe, slow streets throughout the city than a city filled with lots of busy-ish streets.

Ryan would likely argue that I've presented a false choice because he thinks (as far as I can tell) the traffic would just disapear, but I believe the reality is that we'd end up with busier side streets and rather than having 'quiet' times on our busier streets, we'd have more consistent steady traffic. Perhaps that's a better option?

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools