Recent Articles
- Enthusiasm, Concern about 220 Dundurn South Redevelopmentby Jason Allen, published June 18, 2013 in Commentary (10 comments)
- It's Oh So Quietby Ryan McGreal, published June 14, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (14 comments)
- A Complete Streets Policy for Hamiltonby Sara Mayo, published June 13, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (15 comments)
- Devil in the Details of 220 Dundurn South Redevelopmentby Jason Allen, published June 12, 2013 in Commentary (34 comments)
- Pedestrian Use Triples After Crosswalk Installedby Ryan McGreal, published June 10, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (7 comments)
- MacNab Conversion an Opportunity for Better Walkabilityby Jason Leach, published June 10, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (13 comments)
- City Bolsters Crosswalks at Multiple Locationsby Ryan McGreal, published June 07, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (23 comments)
- Documentary Video Explains Dundas EcoParkby Ryan McGreal, published June 07, 2013 in Feature (1 comment)
- Neighbourhood Greenways for Hamiltonby Jason Leach, published June 06, 2013 in Special Report: Cycling (30 comments)
- An Unnecessary Evil: Transportation in the GTHAby Adrian Duyzer, published June 06, 2013 in Opinion (20 comments)
- Hamilton 'Must' Convert Streets Back to Two-Way: Architectsby Ryan McGreal, published May 31, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (88 comments)
- Induced Demand in Action at Aberdeen and Kentby Ryan McGreal, published May 30, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (10 comments)
Article Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
- DemoCampHamilton12 - June 19, 2013, at The Art Gallery of Hamilton, 123 King Street West Hamilton, Ontario
- 13 Upcoming Events...
Recent Blog Entries
- Hamilton Hometown Loveby Ryan McGreal, published June 19, 2013 in Media (5 comments)
- The 'Efficiency' of a One-Way Street Gridby Sean Burak, published June 18, 2013 in Transportation (5 comments)
- Enjoying the Gore Park Promenadeby Ryan McGreal, published June 14, 2013 in Revitalization (10 comments)
- What if RTH Turned Comments into Letters to the Editor?by Larry Pattison, published June 14, 2013 in Site Notes (11 comments)
- 83-Year-Old Pedestrian Dies from Injuries After Collisionby Ryan McGreal, published June 13, 2013 in Transportation (7 comments)
- Hamilton Tactical Urbanism in TreeHuggerby Ryan McGreal, published June 12, 2013 in Activism (1 comment)
- Another Rapid Transit Manager Leaves Cityby Ryan McGreal, published June 10, 2013 in Light Rail (6 comments)
- Best Practices for Protected Bike Lanesby Jason Leach, published June 10, 2013 in Transportation (5 comments)
- Hume Tells Hamilton to Start Thinking Like a Cityby Ryan McGreal, published June 10, 2013 in Revitalization (27 comments)
- LRT Referendum an Excuse Not to Leadby Grant Ranalli, published June 06, 2013 in Light Rail (15 comments)
- Bay Street Closed Between Stuart and Strachanby RTH Staff, published June 05, 2013 in Transportation (9 comments)
- Hamilton Tactical Urbanism in The Atlantic Citiesby Ryan McGreal, published June 05, 2013 in Activism (8 comments)
Blog Archives
By Serendipity (anonymous) | Posted June 13, 2012 at 14:02:30
"Former head traffic engineer Hart Solomon claimed that Cannon Street would never change in our lifetime - that this expediency to through traffic was simply too crucial to the movement of goods through our city."
Hart Solomon told me, in 2007, whilst at a meeting for the North End traffic plan that it would be "over my dead body" that speeds would be reduced on both James N and Burlington Sts in my neighbourhood.
The last traffic casualty on Burlington St that I'm aware of (dec 2011) was not Hart; rather, that of a local, 10 year-old boy crossing the street at Burl/Hughson Sts. He was taken to hospital and survived. The driver, a woman in her 40's, made a southbound turn on John and disappeared into the night.
People like Hart (thank goodness he's gone) and every traffic engineer in this city has done their job and left a fine, deadly and polluted mess that we are still not coping with. Is it not time that we cut this department down, or out, and look to environmental planners and citizens/residents alone to fix the problems traffic engineers seem to have no concerns about? For the life of me, I have never understood why traffic engineers continually have the last words about how we are supposed to live with the deadly traffic blight that they not only created but continue to be the decision makers concerning how we move forward in trying (unsuccessfully) to make our neighbourhoods and streets livable, breathable, walkable, rideable etc... Truly, their time has come and gone but until they are truly and really gone, our nightmare continues.
Reply | Permalink | Context