Comment 73444

By thinking critically (anonymous) | Posted January 28, 2012 at 11:47:17

Councillor Farr's suggestion has merit because it would be making use of (at this time purported) previous infrastructure investments, which all should agree is better sprawl. However, the question should also be asked why City staff would not populate the 2nd tower, instead of being scattered across the city in no less than 4 different buildings.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds