-
Yes We Cannon!
Join the Movement and Spread the Word
Recent Articles
- We Need to Remember the Case for LRTby Ryan McGreal, published May 21, 2013 in Special Report: Light Rail (12 comments)
- The Benefits of Urban Chicken and Bee Pilot Projects at Community Gardensby Joseph Sneep, published May 18, 2013 in Commentary (12 comments)
- Public Works Committee Rejects Bus Lane Pilot Projectby Ryan McGreal, published May 16, 2013 in Special Report: Light Rail (31 comments)
- Focus on Cycling Infrastructure Before Enforcementby Ryan McGreal, published May 16, 2013 in Special Report: Cycling (5 comments)
- Baranga's On the Beach: This Ain't No Beach-Side Hutby Margaret Lindsay Holton, published May 16, 2013 in Reviews (11 comments)
- NYC Redesigns its Streets for Safety, Vitality and Diverse Useby Ryan McGreal, published May 13, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (19 comments)
- Ghost Crosswalks Haunt Hamilton Intersectionsby Undustrial, published May 12, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (19 comments)
- Public Meeting with New Horizon Regarding City Square Phase 3by Kelly Foyle and Simon Kiss, published May 12, 2013 in Commentary (10 comments)
- Yes We Cannon - Bike Lanes 2015by Justin Jones, published May 10, 2013 in Special Report: Cycling (29 comments)
- City Crackdown on Tactical Urbanismby Ryan McGreal, published May 09, 2013 in Special Report (121 comments)
- Invigorating Tactical Urbanism Talk Inspires Actionby Ryan McGreal, published May 08, 2013 in Events (17 comments)
- Durand Neighbourhood 'Betrayed' By New Horizon Rezoning Applicationby Nicholas Kevlahan, published May 08, 2013 in Commentary (41 comments)
Article Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
- Mental Health for a diverse Hamilton - May 23, 2013, at Crowne Plaza Hotel, 150 King Street East
- 20 Upcoming Events...
Recent Blog Entries
- A Trip Down Highway 6by Ryan McGreal, published May 21, 2013 in Transportation (16 comments)
- 83-Year-Old Pedestrian Struck at Upper Gage and Mohawkby Ryan McGreal, published May 16, 2013 in Transportation (7 comments)
- Still Struggling to Make Sense of City Policy on Crosswalksby Nicholas Kevlahan, published May 14, 2013 in Transportation (14 comments)
- Tactical Urbanism and the Judgment of Hart Solomonby Nicholas Kevlahan, published May 13, 2013 in Transportation (8 comments)
- A Poem in Julyby Shekar Chandrashekar, published May 12, 2013 in Arts (1 comment)
- Tactical Urbanism Crackdown in Spacingby Ryan McGreal, published May 10, 2013 in Activism (1 comment)
- Hamilton Sustainability Professionals Network Launch Eventby Justin Jones, published May 09, 2013 in Sustainability (0 comments)
- 20 Jackson Demolition Rumour is Just a Rumour - For Nowby Ryan McGreal, published May 09, 2013 in Revitalization (11 comments)
- Staircase Minor Variance Application to Waive Parking Requirementby RTH Staff, published May 08, 2013 in Activism (4 comments)
- Merulla Motion Calls for Integrity Commissioner to Investigate Mayor Bratinaby Ryan McGreal, published May 07, 2013 in Politics (8 comments)
- Letter: In Defence of Ontario Port Landsby Letter to the Editor, published May 07, 2013 in Revitalization (0 comments)
- Mayor Bratina Recuses Himself from Mayors' Vote on Big Move Revenue Toolsby Ryan McGreal, published May 07, 2013 in Light Rail (4 comments)
Blog Archives
By Mogadon Megalodon (anonymous)
Posted April 11, 2011 at 16:11:38
“A research team at University College, London, had analyzed – for London Transport and Britain’s Department of the Environment, Transport, and the Regions – sixty cases, worldwide, in which roads had been closed or their carrying capacity reduced. “
http://goo.gl/YGhqF
The study in question is S. Cairns, C. Hass-Klau, and P.B. Goodwin: Traffic Impact of Highway Capacity Reductions: Assessment of the Evidence. Landor Publications, London, 1998
In a 2002 follow-up, Dr. Cairns notes that the studies now include 72 cases in total:
“This research has recently been revisited, 12 new case studies have been added, and a survey of professional opinion has been undertaken, to see whether professionals were convinced by the earlier work. The main conclusion from the follow-up work is that the original results were robust – traffic levels can decrease as a result of well implemented schemes, not only because people may change how they choose to travel, but also because they make broader changes to their lifestyles (such as altering where they carry out activities and how often they make a journey, consolidating trips, occasionally working from home, car-sharing – right through to changing where they live or where they work). These changes, collectively, can result in reduced car use. The study also highlighted that patterns of travel are far more flexible than people traditionally assume. For example, according to surveys of peak-hour traffic on a major commuter route in Leeds, only about half of the cars are the same on two successive days.”
Given the generalizations we all make about traffic, that last line is fairly interesting.
Also, for all of these studies, that – with the notable exception of London’s congestion charge – official policy in the UK has apparently tended to tilt in the other direction.
“Given such evidence, it is disappointing that the Government’s first statutory progress report in response to the Road Traffic Reduction (National Targets) Act 1998 was simply entitled Tackling Congestion and Pollution, and that the ‘Ten Year Plan’ for transport investment is based on a scenario of 17 per cent traffic growth.”
Reply | Permalink | Context