Comment 44190

By Confused (anonymous) | Posted July 28, 2010 at 08:33:36

It seems to me that McMeekin just drove a stake through the heart of those wanting the West Harbour. He is saying that the stadium is the legacy and there is no stadium without a tenant as far as I can see. He also stated that the 'whole' community must be considered (i.e. the east mountain); not just 'one stakeholder' (i.e. the West Harbour). How anyone can read support for the west harbour alone in his comments is puzzling to me.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds