Comment 44135

By highwater (registered) | Posted July 27, 2010 at 17:44:31

The Future Fund Board has passed McHattie's 3 part motion:

A) That the $60-million dollars is a loan (The board had previously stated it would be a loan, but council overruled it and changed it to a grant. The board reiterated it should be a loan.) B) That the preferred site is the West Harbour C) IF Council votes for a East Mountain site - then NO Future Fund money be used for the site.

Two citizen members, Clark, and Eisenberger were opposed, Eisenberger apparently saying that he didn't want to prejudice the ongoing negotiations.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds