There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By kevlahan (registered) | Posted October 31, 2014 at 09:46:24 in reply to Comment 105792
My main concern is precisely that the walk signal does not always appear with the green light. This seems to be the standard programming in all these dual vehicle/pedestrian activated lights. This should definitely be fixed here and at all other locations with this problem. Again, why was they light designed this way, together with pedestrian activation?
My secondary concern, as echoed by some of the commenters, is that if pedestrian activated lights do not behave in a predictable way (with a standard, short, delay) pedestrians will learn to simply ignore them because they can't rely on them to predictably produce a pedestrian signal.
I'm glad that traffic staff has lowered the delay from 70s (which is completely unacceptable), but predictable operation should be a goal for pedestrians as well as drivers. I understand that a traffic engineer could look at that light, notice the induction loops on Young and the pedestrian activated buttons and deduce the operation of the system. But all the pedestrian sees is the buttons that say "push to cross" or a "don't walk" together with a green light if they push the button too late.
Again, I was crossing around 8pm under very low traffic volume conditions. It should be possible to change the timing at least for different times of day (e.g. immediate response when traffic is low), even if the goal of moving traffic require a longer delay at later times.
Regarding "outrage", unfortunately I've learnt from over 10 years of working with the DNA on traffic issues that meekly reporting an issue will lead to being ignored. This happened repeatedly, even when the City had asked the DNA for input on street design (e.g. the Walk and Bike for Life workshop).
That's not an ideal situation, but unfortunately that's the way things work.
Remember that the DNA has been trying to get a more balanced, safer and more convenient (for everyone) street network in Durand for over 40 years and has been largely ignored until recently. Read the "Durand Chronicle" for a detailed history of the efforts and responses.
As I've said before, the situation is changing for the better, but the fact that the last two pedestrian activated lights (on Herkimer and Hunter) were deliberately mis-programmed despite instructions they should operate as pedestrian activated lights does not build confidence. And these lights were built using special funds found by Councillor Farr and through the PB process.
Comment edited by kevlahan on 2014-10-31 09:58:24
Permalink | Context